What are Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) and Post-Processing Kinematic (PPK)?
Whether you’re a pro drone pilot or just starting out, understanding these concepts can significantly improve the precision of your aerial surveys and 3D reconstructions, so it is important to know what they are and why they matter.
RTK: Real-Time Corrections for High-Precision Mapping
RTK is a method that allows your drone to receive real-time corrections to its GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) data, resulting in highly accurate positioning for your aerial imagery.
The key is the drone’s ability to connect to a nearby reference station that has been precisely surveyed.
This reference station constantly monitors the satellite signals and calculates corrections, which it then sends back to your drone during the flight.
By applying these corrections instantly, your drone can achieve centimeter-level accuracy, eliminating the need for costly ground control points.
RTK is particularly useful when you require precise mapping for applications like construction, mining, or precision agriculture. However, it does require a reliable internet connection to the reference station, and the drone must be within a few miles of the correction source for optimal performance.
PPK: Post-Processing for Consistent Accuracy
In contrast, PPK relies on post-processing the GNSS data collected by your drone during the flight.
Instead of real-time corrections, the drone logs all the raw satellite data, including timestamps, satellite positions, and other metadata. Simultaneously, a GNSS receiver at a known, surveyed location on the ground also logs this data.
After the flight, you can use specialized software to analyze the ground station’s data and apply corrections to the drone’s GNSS recordings. This process aligns the drone’s positions with the known, fixed location of the ground station, resulting in highly accurate geotags for your aerial imagery.
The benefit of PPK is that it doesn’t require a live internet connection or proximity to a reference station.
This makes it a versatile option for remote or hard-to-reach areas where reliable connectivity may be a challenge. However, the post-processing step adds an extra layer of complexity and time to your workflow.
Choosing the Right Approach for Your Needs
Both RTK and PPK offer significant advantages in terms of mapping accuracy, but the choice ultimately depends on your specific project requirements and constraints.
RTK is the more convenient option, providing real-time corrections and eliminating the need for post-processing. It’s an excellent choice when you have reliable internet access and are working within a few miles of a reference station. The immediate availability of high-precision data can be invaluable for time-sensitive projects.
On the other hand, PPK may be the better solution if you’re operating in remote areas or when you don’t have access to a suitable RTK correction source. The post-processing approach also offers more control over the data and the ability to fine-tune the corrections if needed.
Many drone professionals use a combination of RTK and PPK, taking advantage of the strengths of both methods. By logging raw GNSS data during the flight and applying both real-time and post-processed corrections, they can achieve the highest level of mapping accuracy and reliability.
As you plan your next drone mapping project, carefully consider your accuracy requirements, logistical constraints, and the available resources in your area. Mastering the nuances of RTK and PPK will empower you to capture the most precise, reliable, and valuable data from your aerial surveys.
Article By:
Share this post
